Gordon Brown, the man who has forgotten that he is a Fifer, last week doubled the air passenger duty as an "environmental" measure. Maybe I am just thick, but I just don't see how this will help save the planet. It is just yet another not so stealthy task, so that he does not have to raise income tax, which he knows is a vote loser. Using the environment as an excuse at this point in time is an easy option, as so many people are falling for the climate change hoodwinking.
Doubling the rate of tax on flights is not going to help the environment, because he has set it at a level where it is not quite enough to put many people off flying, although there will no doubt be some people who stretched themselves before who will be unable to fly as much now. So, we may end up with the crazy situation of planes flying with less passengers, therefore making them less fuel-efficient (passengers carried per gallon of fuel). Unless the money from APD is ring-fenced for some new trees or cleaning up rivers (aye right) then I will just not swallow the line that this is for the environment.
From a personal point of view, this APD thing stinks because he has based it on when you fly, and not when you booked. I have had flights booked to fly to the US for seven months now, yet I will have to pay this tax. The airlines are currently saying that this situation could mean that people who have pre-booked like me will have to pay the extra tax when we arrive at the airport, and since check-in staff cannot accept money, then we will have to pay by credit card at the check-in desk (£160 in my case, bollox). What on earth is that going to do to the already nightmarish British airport queues and experience? You couldn't make it up!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This tax is indeed a pile of pants.
If Broon wanted to save the environment, he'd tax tungsten filament lightbulbs so that they are the same price as energy saving ones.
People would then be encouraged to buy energy saving bulbs, and they'd actually *save* money in the long term.
The UK could dispense with one of its power stations due to reduced load.
Broon - APD is a bucket of crap.
Something else that bugs me - the other day an environmentalist told me that a certain building produced "280 Olympic swimming pool's worth of CO2".
"Gaseous CO2 or liquified CO2?" I asked.
"Gaseous," he replied.
What pressure? I wondered, but it didn't matter, because my point had been made.
Who in their right mind would measure a gas in units of swimming pools?? Surely airships would be a more intuitive measure. "Half a Zeppelin" is a much easier measure to visualise, than 280 swimming pools.
However, if we are looking at the CO2 in liquified format - which makes sense, as that is the format the fuel is provided by BOC or Calor - 280 swimming pools of gaseous CO2 work out roughly as 1/4 a swimming pool of liquified CO2. This is a much easier, and more honest, measure to understand.
I can only conclude that environmentalists use such dishonest measures because they want to scare people about the scale of things.
Rant over...
Post a Comment